4.5 Article

Raman spectroscopy as a tool for detecting mitochondrial fitness

Journal

JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 933-939

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.4930

Keywords

mitochondria; biomarkers; Raman spectroscopy; linear discriminant analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. AHA-MOMENT from the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Slovenia
  2. MINA (Slovenia-Italy Interregional Grant)
  3. SUNGREEN FP7 RegPot Grant
  4. Kempe Foundation
  5. EU structural fund Norra Norrland Objective II

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Raman spectroscopy allows the molecular chemical analysis of whole living cells by comparing them to known Raman signatures of specific vibrational bonds. In this work we used Raman spectroscopy to differentiate between wild type yeast cells and mutants characterized by increased or reduced mitochondrial fragmentation. To associate mitochondrial fragmentation with biochemical markers, we performed Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) of whole cell Raman spectra (similar to 50-100 cells/spectrum). We show that the long-lived, less fragmented mutants fall into a significantly distant cluster from the wild type and short-lived, more fragmented mutants. Clustering depends on respiratory growth and coincides with that of membrane phospholipids and some respiratory chain components. Spectral clustering is supported by enzymatic activity measurements of OXPHOS Complexes. In addition, we find that NAD(P)H autofluorescence also correlates with mitochondrial fragmentation, representing another likely aging biomarker, besides phospholipids and OXPHOS components. In summary, we demonstrate that Raman spectroscopy has the potential to become a powerful tool for differentiating healthy from unhealthy aged tissues, as well as for the prognostic evaluation of mitochondrial function and fitness. (c) 2016 The Authors Journal of Raman Spectroscopy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available