Quantitative resilience assessment of the network-level metro rail service?s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

The metro rail system has proven to be the most efficient high-capacity carriers. During the unprecedented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) challenge, non-pharmaceutical interventions become a widely adopted strategy to limit physical movements and interactions. For situational awareness and decision support, data -driven analytics about serviceability are invaluable to metro agencies and decision-makers of cities. This paper presents a data-driven analytical framework that quantitatively evaluates COVID-19-caused resilience performance of metro rails. Several characteristics (e.g., vulnerability, robustness, rapidity, and degree to return) of the metro system's responses to the disturbance were identified and modeled with multivariate multiple regression. The applicability and rationality of the resilience evaluation model were validated by the metro transit data of the United States. The preliminary results disclosed that metro rail transit encountered more vulnerability (90.6%) in passenger trips than motorbus and light rail (around 70%). A set of statistical models were employed to disentangle the effect of socio-demographic variables and COVID-19-related factors on the metro transit. The disclosed emerging knowledge of resilience provides an in-depth understanding of mobility trends for the public and time-sensitive decision support for the policy effects, to further improve the service and management of the metro system under the spread of the epidemic.

Automated summary

The metro rail system is the most efficient high-capacity carrier, and data-driven analytics are invaluable for metro agencies and decision-makers to evaluate the resilience of metro rails during the COVID-19 challenge. A data-driven analytical framework was developed to quantitatively assess the resilience performance of metro rails. The preliminary results showed that metro rail transit had higher vulnerability in passenger trips compared to motorbus and light rail.