4.5 Article

Benefiting from Open Innovation: A Multidimensional Model of Absorptive Capacity

Journal

JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 269-288

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12361

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University
  2. Garwood Center for Corporate Innovation, Haas School of Business, University of California Berkeley

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While recent studies shed some light on the performance implications of open innovation, there is a gap in understanding how firms can translate their openness into innovation outcomes. In particular, it is unclear whetherand if so, howfirms can create a competitive advantage in product innovation by tapping into external sources of innovation. To address this gap, this study conceptualizes multidimensional components of absorptive capacity and develops a nomological network that explicates relationships between these components and competitive advantage in product innovation. By marrying the open innovation and absorptive capacity perspectives, higher-order models of absorptive capacity are proposed which delineate the underlying processes to recognize, assimilate, and exploit external sources of innovation. The empirical analysis of the nomological network based on original survey data reveals important findings. First, there is a positive indirect baseline association between external technological resource access and competitive advantage in product innovation, mediated by the firm's technology-related capabilities. Second, components of absorptive capacity modify this indirect baseline relationship. Recognition capacity is positively associated with external technological resource access and therefore, operates as an antecedent to the proposed baseline relationship. Assimilation capacity constitutes a relevant condition to the proposed baseline relationship. The indirect association between external technological resource access and competitive advantage in product innovation is dependent on the level of assimilation capacity. Exploitation capacity has an additional and independent direct positive association with competitive advantage in product innovation. This study contributes to the open innovation literature by delineating organizational processes that help to explain interfirm differences in benefiting from external sources of innovation. In addition, this study adds to the absorptive capacity literature by developing and validating a set of measures that captures, individually and in concert, three components of absorptive capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Engineering, Industrial

Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness

Ann-Kristin Zobel, Boris Lokshin, John Hagedoorn

TECHNOVATION (2017)

Article Management

A Temporal Perspective on Boundary Spanning: Engagement Dynamics and Implications for Knowledge Transfer

Ann-Kristin Zobel, Lukas Falcke, Stephen D. Comello

Summary: This study investigates how boundary spanners increase external knowledge inflow by engaging with external and internal parties. It focuses on engagement dynamics and the degree of switching between external and internal engagement. The study finds that strong switching is associated with a segmented knowledge structure and efficient processing, while weak or no switching is associated with a blended knowledge structure and reflective processing. The association between switching and knowledge transfer is contingent on the stickiness of knowledge and the importance of boundary-spanning activities over time.

ORGANIZATION SCIENCE (2023)

Article Economics

The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis

Marcel Bogers, Ann-Kristin Zobel, Allan Afuah, Esteve Almirall, Sabine Brunswicker, Linus Dahlander, Lars Frederiksen, Annabelle Gawer, Marc Gruber, Stefan Haefliger, John Hagedoorn, Dennis Hilgers, Keld Laursen, Mats G. Magnusson, Ann Majchrzak, Ian P. McCarthy, Kathrin M. Moeslein, Satish Nambisan, Frank T. Piller, Agnieszka Radziwon, Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, Jonathan Sims, Anne L. J. Ter Wal

INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION (2017)

Article Business

Does patenting help or hinder open innovation? Evidence from new entrants in the solar industry

Ann-Kristin Zobel, Benjamin Balsmeier, Henry Chesbrough

INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE (2016)

Article Management

The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation

John Hagedoorn, Ann-Kristin Zobel

TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (2015)

Article Business

Partner Type Diversity in Alliance Portfolios: Multiple Dimensions, Boundary Conditions and Firm Innovation Performance

John Hagedoorn, Boris Lokshin, Ann-Kristin Zobel

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (2018)

No Data Available