4.8 Article

Degradation mechanism of over-charged LiCoO2/mesocarbon microbeads battery during shallow depth of discharge cycling

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages 255-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.030

Keywords

LiCoO2/MCMB battery; Over-charging; Capacity fading mechanism; Long-term cycling; Lithium dendrites; Reduction and dissolution of cobalt

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China [2012AA110203]
  2. gs2:National Science Foundation of China [51202047]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LiCoO2/mesocarbon microbeads (MCMB) batteries are over-charged to different voltage (4.4 V, 4.5 V, 4.6 V, and 4.7 V, respectively) for ten times, and then are cycled 1000 times for shallow depth of discharge. The morphology, structure, and electrochemical performance of the electrode materials were studied in detail in order to identify the capacity fading mechanism of over-charged battery after long-term cycling. The cycling performances of LiCoO2/MCMB batteries are gradually aggravated with the increase of over-charging voltage and the degradation mechanism is diverse upon the degree of overcharging. The capacity fading after long-term cycling of battery over-charged to 4.6 V or 4.7 V is mainly attributed to the cathodes. Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) demonstrates that the lower valence state of cobalt exists on the surface of the LiCoO2 after serious over-charging (4.6 V or 4.7 V), and cobalt is dissolved then deposited on the anode according to the result of energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). However, after shallow over-charging (4.4 V or 4.5 V), the capacity deterioration is proposed as the loss of active lithium, presented by the generation of the SEI film on the anode, which is verified by water washed tests. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available