4.6 Review

Green Advertising on Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142114424

Keywords

green advertising; consumer behavior; social media; systematic literature review (SLR); research agenda; citation; greenwashing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consumer interest in environmental protection has been on the rise in recent decades, leading to a growing trend of green advertising on social media. Research has shown a significant interest in green advertising content and greenwashing, as well as a focus on green skepticism and generational differences.
Consumer interest in environmental protection has grown in recent decades, alongside a shift in companies' strategies to embrace a greener way of doing business. Green advertising is rapidly expanding and gaining popularity. With more and more consumers being actively involved in social media searching and purchasing products, social media advertising is transformed into a principal way of communication. Although prior research has addressed green marketing and advertising, their presence in social media has been largely neglected. Based on a systematic review approach, the present study addresses recent trends and developments in green advertising on social media. We used PRISMA for the systematic review of eighty-one articles published between 2011 and 2022. Green advertising content, and greenwashing in particular have attracted significant research interest. Green skepticism and the role of generations are gaining popularity. The descriptive analysis provides article, author, and journal-related information (i.e., citations, year of publications, journals, etc.). This systematic literature review reports the trends in the topic, highlights existing research gaps, and suggests future research avenues. Research and managerial implications are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available