3.8 Article

Nebivolol: an effective option against long-lasting dyspnoea following COVID-19 pneumonia- a pivotal double-blind, cross-over controlled study

Journal

MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PAGEPRESS PUBL
DOI: 10.4081/mrm.2022.886

Keywords

Nebivolol; COVID-19; vascular effects; lung perfusion; capillary blood volume (Vc); simultaneous DLCO and DLNO assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study indicates that long-lasting dyspnea is related to hidden abnormalities in lung capillary vasculature, which may persist even after complete resolution of parenchymal lesions. Nebivolol significantly improves dyspnea score and capillary blood volume in these patients.
Background: Pulmonary microvascular occlusions can aggravate SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and result in a variable decrease in capillary blood volume (Vc). Dyspnoea may persist for several weeks after hospital discharge in many patients who have radiologically recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia. Dyspnoea is frequently unexplained in these cases because abnormalities in lung vasculature are understudied. Furthermore, even when they are identified, ther-apeutic options are still lacking in clinical practice, with nitric oxide (NO) supplementation being used only for severe respiratory failure in the hospital setting. Nebivolol is the only selective (31 adrenoceptor antagonist capable of inducing nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation by stimulating endothelial NO synthase via (33 agonism. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of nebivolol versus placebo in patients who had low Vc and complained of dyspnoea for several weeks after COVID-19 pneumonia.Methods: Patients of both genders, aged >= 18 years, non-smokers, who had a CT scan that revealed no COVID-related parenchymal lesions but still complaining of dyspnoea 12-16 weeks after hospital discharge, were recruited. Spirometrical volumes, blood haemoglobin, SpO2, simultaneous diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (CO) and NO (DLCO and DLNO, respectively), DLNO/DLCO ratio, Vc and exhaled NO (eNO) were measured together with their dyspnoea score (DS), heart frequency (HF), and blood arterial pressure (BAP). Data were collected before and one week after both placebo (P) and nebivolol (N) (2.5 mg od) double-blind cross-over administered at a two-week interval. Data were sta-tistically compared, and p<0.05 assumed as statistically significant.Results: Eight patients (3 males) were investigated. In baseline, their mean DS was 2.5 +/- 0.6 SD, despite the normality of lung volumes. DLCO and DLNO mean values were lower than predicted, while mean DLNO/DLCO ratio was higher. Mean Vc proved substantially reduced. Placebo did not modify any variable (all p=ns) while N improved DLco and Vc signif-icantly (+8.5%, p<0.04 and +17.7%, p<0.003, respectively). eNO also was significantly increased (+17.6%, p<0.002). Only N lowered the dyspnoea score (-76%, p<0.001). Systolic and diastolic BAP were slightly lowered (-7.5%, p<0.02 and-5.1%, p<0.04, respectively), together with HF (-16.8%, p<0.03).Conclusions: The simultaneous assessment of DLNO, DLCO, DLNO/DLCO ratio, and Vc confirmed that long-lasting dysp-noea is related to hidden abnormalities in the lung capillary vasculature. These abnormalities can persist even after the complete resolution of parenchymal lesions regardless of the normality of lung volumes. Nebivolol, but not placebo, improves DS and Vc significantly. The mechanism suggested is the NO-mediated vasodilation via the (33 adrenoceptor stimulation of endothelial NO synthase. This hypothesis is supported by the substantial increase of eNO only assessed after nebivolol. As the nebivolol tolerability in these post-COVID normotensive patients was very good, the therapeutic use of nebivolol against residual and symptomatic signs of long-COVID can be suggested in out-patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available