4.6 Article

Hormonal Sensitivity Decreases During the Progression of Flower Senescence in Lilium longifloruma

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 402-412

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00344-016-9648-4

Keywords

Abscisic acid; Cytokinins; Flower senescence; Gibberellins; Hormones; Lilium longiflorum

Categories

Funding

  1. Catalan Government (ICREA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although lilies (Lilium sp.) are the fourth sold cut flower in the world, much remains to be discovered about the senescence and post-harvest physiology of these ethylene-insensitive flowers. This study investigated the hormonal regulation of flower senescence in Lilium longiflorum with a focus on the possible changes in sensitivity to phytohormones during the progression of tepal senescence. After characterizing the hormonal profile of L. longiflorum 'White Heaven' tepals from anthesis to complete wilting, we evaluated the changes in hormonal sensitivity during senescence by application of a combination of gibberellins and cytokinins at various times post anthesis. We observed a progressive loss of sensitivity to the hormonal treatment: from an increase of more than 2 days in flower lifespan when applied one day after anthesis, to a complete loss of vase-life prolongation when treated at the fourth day after anthesis or later. These observations were accompanied by various changes in the underlying hormonal contents, especially in the gibberellins and abscisic acid (ABA) profile, which was dependent on the application time. The results not only confirm the role of gibberellins and cytokinins as inhibitors, and ABA as a promoter of senescence, but also reveal a progressive loss in hormonal sensitivity and a hormonal cross-talk during the progression of senescence in tepals of L. longiflorum. We conclude that both hormonal levels and sensitivity modulate the progression of tepal senescence in L. longiflorum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available