Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study

Fake data, paper mills, and their authors: The International Journal of Cancer reacts to this threat to scientific integrity

(2021) Stefanie Heck et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER

The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science

(2021) Holly Else et al.   NATURE

Should the European Union have an office of research integrity?

(2021) C Candal-Pedreira et al.   European Journal of Internal Medicine

The raw truth about paper mills

(2021) Jana Christopher   FEBS LETTERS

Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?

(2020) Jennifer A. Byrne et al.   FEBS LETTERS

Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors

(2018) Isabel Campos-Varela et al.   Gaceta Sanitaria

China sets a strong example on how to address scientific fraud

(2018)   NATURE

China introduces ‘social’ punishments for scientific misconduct

(2018) David Cyranoski   NATURE

Publish or impoverish

(2017) Wei Quan et al.   Aslib Journal of Information Management

A shady market in scientific papers mars Iran’s rise in science

(2016) Richard Stone   SCIENCE

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

(2015) Daniele Fanelli et al.   PLoS One

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

(2012) F. C. Fang et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA