4.6 Article

Unexpected factors affecting the excitability of human motoneurones in voluntary and stimulated contractions

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 594, Issue 10, Pages 2707-2717

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP272164

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (of Australia)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are major spinal changes induced by repetitive activity and fatigue that could contribute to 'central' fatigue but the mechanisms involved are poorly understood in humans. Here we confirmed that the recurrent motoneuronal discharge (F-wave) is reduced during relaxation immediately after a sustained maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of an intrinsic hand muscle (abductor digiti minimi, ADM) and explored the relationship between motoneurone firing and the depression of F-waves in three ways. First, the depression (in both F-wave area and F-wave persistence) was present after a 10 s MVC (initial decrease 36.4 +/- 19.1%; mean +/- SD) but not after a submaximal voluntary contraction at 50% maximum. Second, to evoke motoneurone discharge without volitional effort, 10 s tetanic contractions were produced by supramaximal ulnar nerve stimulation at the elbow at physiological frequencies of 25 and 40 Hz. Surprisingly, neither produced depression of F-waves in ADM to test supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist. Finally, a sustained MVC (3 min) of the antagonist to ADM (4th palmar interosseous) depressed F-waves in the anatomically close ADM (20 +/- 18.2%) but not in the more remote first dorsal interosseous on the radial side of the hand. We argue that depression of F-waves after voluntary contractions may not be due to repetitive activation of the motoneurones but requires descending voluntary drive. Furthermore, this effect may depress nearby, but not distant, spinal motoneurone pools and it reveals potentially novel mechanisms controlling the output of human motoneurones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available