4.8 Article

Genome-wide screen of otosclerosis in population biobanks: 27 loci and shared associations with skeletal structure

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32936-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Otosclerosis is a common form of hearing loss, with an unclear genetic etiology. A genome-wide association study meta-analysis of otosclerosis identified 27 genetic loci, pointing to genes involved in bone remodeling, skeletal disorders, and transforming growth factor beta signaling.
Otosclerosis is one of the most common causes of conductive hearing loss, affecting 0.3% of the population. It typically presents in adulthood and half of the patients have a positive family history. The pathophysiology of otosclerosis is poorly understood. A previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified a single association locus in an intronic region of RELN. Here, we report a meta-analysis of GWAS studies of otosclerosis in three population-based biobanks comprising 3504 cases and 861,198 controls. We identify 23 novel risk loci (p < 5 x 10(-8)) and report an association in RELN and three previously reported candidate gene or linkage regions (TGFB1, MEPE, and OTSC7). We demonstrate developmental stage-dependent immunostaining patterns of MEPE and RUNX2 in mouse otic capsules. In most association loci, the nearest protein-coding genes are implicated in bone remodelling, mineralization or severe skeletal disorders. We highlight multiple genes involved in transforming growth factor beta signalling for follow-up studies. Otosclerosis is a common form of hearing loss, with an unclear genetic etiology. Here, the authors perform a genome-wide association study meta-analysis of otosclerosis identifying 27 genetic loci, pointing to genes involved in bone remodeling, skeletal disorders and transforming growth factor beta signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available