4.4 Article

Surface modification of cylindrical implants using electric discharge-assisted centreless turning

Journal

SURFACE ENGINEERING
Volume 38, Issue 10-12, Pages 996-1006

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02670844.2023.2168595

Keywords

Dental implant; electric discharge-assisted centreless turning; in vitro analysis; surface roughness; Ti6Al4V alloy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the use of electric discharge-assisted centreless turning (EDCLT) for modifying titanium alloy surfaces in dental implants. The experiments were planned using a L9 Taguchi orthogonal array design, with impulse current, pulse on time, and pulse off time as input variables, and surface roughness and hardness as output variables. The machined surfaces exhibited improved corrosion resistance, bioactivity, and an average hardness ranging from 43.1 HRC to 52.8 HRC, compared to the unmachined surfaces. The machined piece with an average surface roughness of 1.25 μm showed the highest bone mineralization.
Numerous techniques are used for the surface modification of titanium alloy. This research uses electric discharge-assisted centreless turning (EDCLT) to modify the titanium alloy surfaces used for dental implants. Experimentations were planned according to the L9 Taguchi orthogonal array design. Impulse current (IP), Pulse on time (Ton), and pulse off time (Toff) were selected as input variables, and surface roughness and hardness as output variables. The machined surface's average surface roughness (Ra) was less than 1.90 mu m. In contrast to unmachined surfaces, the machined surfaces had improved corrosion resistance and bioactivity. The average hardness of machining surfaces was found to be from 43.1 HRC to 52.8 HRC, while unmachined surfaces had an average hardness of 42.7 HRC. The machined piece with an average surface roughness (Ra) of 1.25 mu m got the highest bone mineralization compared to other surface roughness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available