Journal
OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 611-622Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06401-5
Keywords
One anastomosis gastric bypass; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Obesity; Meta-analysis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The results showed that OAGB had advantages in certain indexes, such as weight loss, BMI improvement, and reduced postoperative complications. However, there were no significant statistical differences observed in other indexes. More large-scale and long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to verify the efficacy of OAGB.
The objective of this review is to systematically review the efficacy and safety outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). From inception to July 4, 2022, a systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials comparing OAGB with RYGB in obesity. A meta-analysis performed using the RevMan 5.4.1 software evaluations was completed. We identified 1217 reports; after exclusions, eight trials with a total of 931 patients were eligible for analysis. Compared with RYGB, OAGB had multiple advantageous indexes. Examples include percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months (P = 0.009), body mass index (BMI) at 2 years (P < 0.00001), early postoperative complication (P = 0.04), remission of dyslipidemia (P < 0.0001), and operative time (P < 0.00001). No significant statistical difference was observed in BMI at 6 months, %EWL at 6 months, BMI at 12 months, percent of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) at 2 years, BMI at 5 years, intraoperative complications, late postoperative complications, remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia or gastroesophageal reflux disease remission between OAGB and RYGB. OAGB is no less effective than RYGB; no significant differences in weight loss efficacy were observed, and more large and long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to verify this. In addition, studies have shown that OAGB has a shorter operation time, fewer early postoperative complications, and a shorter learning curve, making it easier for young surgeons to perform.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available