4.5 Article

Species-delimitation and phylogenetic analyses of some cosmopolitan species of Hypnea (Rhodophyta) reveal synonyms and misapplied names to H.cervicornis, including a new species from Brazil

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 774-792

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12436

Keywords

Cystocloniaceae; Hypnea aspera; Hypnea flexicaulis; Hypnea tenuis; single-marker delimitation methods; synonymy; systematics; taxonomy

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [BrBOL 564945/2010-2, UNIVERSAL 477614/2013-2]
  2. Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/11833-3]
  3. Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB) [PRONEM T.O. PNE. 0020/2011, REDES T.O. RED006/2012]
  4. CNPq
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/11833-3] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypnea has an intricate nomenclatural history due to a wide pantropical distribution and considerable morphological variation. Recent molecular studies have provided further clarification on the systematics of the genus; however, species of uncertain affinities remain due to flawed taxonomic identification. Detailed analyses coupled with literature review indicated a strong relationship among H.aspera, H.cervicornis, H.flexicaulis, and H.tenuis, suggesting a need for further taxonomic studies. Here, we analyzed sequences from two molecular markers (COI-5P and rbcL) and performed several DNA-based delimitation methods (mBGD, ABGD, SPN, PTP and GMYC). These molecular approaches were contrasted with morphological and phylogenetic evidence from type specimens and/or topotype collections of related species under a conservative approach. Our results demonstrate that H.aspera and H.flexicaulis represent heterotypic synonyms of H.cervicornis and indicate the existence of a misidentified Hypnea species, widely distributed on the Brazilian coast, described here as a new species: H.brasiliensis. Finally, inconsistencies observed among our results based on six different species delimitation methods evidence the need for adequate sampling and marker choice for different methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available