4.5 Article

Protein Nitrogen Determination by Kjeldahl Digestion and Ion Chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages 1851-1857

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.03.039

Keywords

analytical biochemistry; biotechnology; proteins; vaccines; protein nitrogen determination; Kjeldahl digestion; ion chromatography; suppressed conductivity detection; oxalate complexation with copper and aluminum; validation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report development and validation of a simple, rapid, and accurate method for the quantitation of protein nitrogen, which combines Kjeldahl digestion and ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection and requires nanomolar amount of nitrogen in samples (>= 10 mu g protein). The mechanism of suppressed conductivity detection does not permit analysis of samples containing copper (present in Kjeldahl digestion solution) and aluminum (present in many vaccines as adjuvants) due to precipitation of their hydroxides within the suppressor. We overcame this problem by including 10 mu M oxalic acid in Kjeldahl digests and in the eluent (30 mM methanesulfonic acid). The chromatography is performed using an IonPac CS-16 cation exchange column by isocratic elution. The method reduces the digestion time to less than 1 h and eliminates the distillation and titration steps of the Kjeldahl method, thereby reducing the analysis time significantly and improving precision and accuracy. To determine protein nitrogen in samples containing non-protein nitrogen, proteins are precipitated by a mixture of deoxycholate and trichloroacetic acid and the precipitates are analyzed after dissolving in KOH. The method is particularly useful for biological samples that are limited and can also be applied to food, environmental, and other materials. (C) 2016 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available