4.5 Article

Quality by Design Approaches to Formulation Robustness-An Antibody Case Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages 1667-1675

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.02.013

Keywords

biotechnology; formulation; HPLC; multivariate analysis; oxidation; factorial design; protein aggregation; protein formulation; proteins; stability

Funding

  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The International Conference on Harmonization Q8 (R2) includes a requirement that Critical formulation attributes and process parameters are generally identified through an assessment of the extent to which their variation can impact the quality of the drug product, that is, the need to assess the robustness of a formulation. In this article, a quality-by-design-based definition of a robust formulation for a biopharmaceutical product is proposed and illustrated with a case study. A multivariate formulation robustness study was performed for a selected formulation of a monoclonal antibody to demonstrate acceptable quality at the target composition as well as at the edges of the allowable composition ranges and fulfillment of the end-of-shelf-life stability requirements of 36 months at the intended storage temperature (2 degrees C-8 degrees C). Extrapolation of 24 months' formulation robustness data to end of shelf life showed that the MAb formulation was robust within the claimed formulation composition ranges. Based on this case study, we propose that a formulation can be claimed as robust if all drug substance and drug product critical quality attributes remain within their respective end-of-shelf-life critical quality attribute-acceptance criteria throughout the entire claimed formulation composition range. (C) 2016 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available