Comparing alternative methods of modelling cumulative effects of oil and gas footprint on boreal bird abundance
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparing alternative methods of modelling cumulative effects of oil and gas footprint on boreal bird abundance
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 147-168
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-11-16
DOI
10.1007/s10980-022-01531-8
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Guidance for analytical methods to cumulative effects assessment for terrestrial species
- (2021) C. Lisa Mahon et al. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS
- Lessons learned from comparing spatially explicit models and the Partners in Flight approach to estimate population sizes of boreal birds in Alberta, Canada
- (2020) Péter Sólymos et al. CONDOR
- Small mammal abundance differs between pipelines, edges, and interior boreal forest habitat
- (2019) Amy F Darling et al. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
- Additive and interactive cumulative effects on boreal landbirds: winners and losers in a multi‐stressor landscape
- (2019) C. Lisa Mahon et al. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
- Long-term changes in boreal forest occupancy within regenerating harvest units
- (2018) Lionel Leston et al. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
- Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications
- (2017) Julia Shonfield et al. Avian Conservation and Ecology
- Boreal bird abundance estimates within different energy sector disturbances vary with point count radius
- (2016) Erin Bayne et al. CONDOR
- Community structure and niche characteristics of upland and lowland western boreal birds at multiple spatial scales
- (2016) C. Lisa Mahon et al. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
- The Energy Footprint: How Oil, Natural Gas, and Wind Energy Affect Land for Biodiversity and the Flow of Ecosystem Services
- (2015) Nathan F. Jones et al. BIOSCIENCE
- Effectiveness monitoring for biodiversity: comparing 15 year old structural retention harvest areas to fires in boreal aspen
- (2015) David J. Huggard et al. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
- The spatial patterns of anthropogenic disturbance in the western Canadian boreal forest following oil and gas development
- (2015) Paul D. Pickell et al. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
- Remote sensing proxies of productivity and moisture predict forest stand type and recovery rate following experimental harvest
- (2015) Wiebe Nijland et al. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
- Threshold detection: matching statistical methodology to ecological questions and conservation planning objectives
- (2015) Judith D. Toms et al. Avian Conservation and Ecology
- Mapping attributes of Canada’s forests at moderate resolution through kNN and MODIS imagery
- (2014) A. Beaudoin et al. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
- Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla) Territory Placement Near Seismic Lines is Influenced by Forest Regeneration and Conspecific Density
- (2013) Hedwig E. Lankau et al. Avian Conservation and Ecology
- Calibrating indices of avian density from non-standardized survey data: making the most of a messy situation
- (2013) Péter Sólymos et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Using binomial distance-sampling models to estimate the effective detection radius of point-count surveys across boreal Canada
- (2012) Steven M. Matsuoka et al. AUK
- Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment
- (2011) Mark Burgman et al. Conservation Letters
- Quantifying land use of oil sands production: a life cycle perspective
- (2009) Sarah M Jordaan et al. Environmental Research Letters
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started