4.4 Article

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in pediatric patients in Greece: Compliance with guidelines and impact of an educational intervention

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 51, Issue 8, Pages 1307-1311

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.11.017

Keywords

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis; Children; Intervention; Guidelines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Purpose: Appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) prevents surgical site infections (SSI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention to improve adherence to PAP guidelines in pediatric patients. Methods: A three-phase prospective study with a pre-post design was conducted from April 2013 to December 2014. All patients who underwent one or more surgical procedures were enrolled. A modified Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) Denominator for Procedure form was used to collect clinical and PAP data. The educational intervention was targeted at all pediatric surgeons in the department. Outcomes assessed were the appropriateness of the agent selected for PAP (according to international guidelines) and appropriate termination of PAP within 24 h of surgery completion. SSI rates were calculated before and after the intervention. Results: During the study period 889 children were enrolled (219 in the preintervention and 670 in the post intervention period). The percentage of patients receiving appropriate PAP improved from 6.2% to 77.1% after the educational intervention (p < 0.001). The median duration of PAP was reduced from 5 to 1 days in preintervention and post-intervention period, respectively. There was no increase in the rate of SSIs (0.93% and 0.92%, p = 0.992, in preintervention and postintervention, respectively). Conclusions: An educational intervention targeted at pediatric surgeons improved the selection of agent and timely discontinuation of PAP. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available