4.7 Article

High performance rechargeable aqueous zinc-iodine batteries via a double iodine species fixation strategy with mesoporous carbon and modified separator

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 629, Issue -, Pages 279-287

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.09.079

Keywords

Zinc-iodine battery; Shuttle effect; Mesoporous carbon; Modified separator; Low capacity decay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a new structure for zinc-iodine batteries (ZIBs) that addresses the issues of low electron conductivity, shuttle effect, and highly soluble iodine species. By employing a double fixation strategy and specific materials, the ZIBs demonstrate excellent electrochemical performance.
With the increasing requirement for high capacity energy storage systems, a large amount of recent work has focused on the development of zinc-iodine batteries (ZIBs) on account of high energy density, fast redox kinetics, and excellent reversibility. Nevertheless, low electron conductivity, the shuttle effect, and highly soluble iodine species (I2, I-, and I3-) have impeded their widespread application. In this study, metal organic framework-5 (MOF-5)-derived mesoporous carbon (MPC) loaded iodine (MPC/I2) cathode and the single-sided ketjen black modified cotton fiber (KB@CF) separator are designed to solve the problems mentioned above. That is, the double fixation strategy using MPC and KB@CF separators for iodine species suppresses the shuttle effect. Therefore, the ZIBs constructed with the MPC/I2 cathode and the KB@CF separator can exhibit excellent electrochemical performance. At the current density of 0.1 A g-1, a high discharge specific capacity of 137 mAh g-1 is still available after 300 cycles. Meanwhile, it exhibits a low capacity decay rate at long cycling (0.030% per cycle over 2000 cycles). (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available