Utility of the CANUKA Scoring System in the Risk Assessment of Upper GI Bleeding
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Utility of the CANUKA Scoring System in the Risk Assessment of Upper GI Bleeding
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume Publish Ahead of Print, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Online
2023-02-03
DOI
10.1097/mcg.0000000000001735
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018
- (2018) Joseph JY Sung et al. GUT
- Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- (2018) Kathryn Oakland et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study
- (2017) Adrian J Stanley et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study
- (2017) Adrian J Stanley et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The Predictive Value of Preendoscopic Risk Scores to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review
- (2016) Rosa Ramaekers et al. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Adherence to Guidelines: A National Audit of the Management of Acute upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. The REASON Registry
- (2016) Yidan Lu et al. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
- (2015) Ian Gralnek et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (TRIGGER): a pragmatic, open-label, cluster randomised feasibility trial
- (2015) Vipul Jairath et al. LANCET
- Sa1078 Using a Process Improvement Program and Best Practice Data to Decrease Cost and Length of Stay Among Patients With Upper GI Bleeds in a Large Tertiary Hospital
- (2015) Drew B. Schembre et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Is the AIM65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?
- (2014) Sung Hoon Jung WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding
- (2013) Robert V. Bryant et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Management of Patients With Ulcer Bleeding
- (2012) Loren Laine et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- The Glasgow Blatchford Score Is the Most Accurate Assessment of Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
- (2012) Stig Borbjerg Laursen et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Does This Patient Have a Severe Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed?
- (2012) F. Douglas Srygley et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding
- (2011) John R. Saltzman et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit
- (2011) S. A. Hearnshaw et al. GUT
- Changing trends in acute upper-GI bleeding: a population-based study
- (2009) Silvano Loperfido et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started