4.5 Review

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on heart valve disease

Journal

HEART
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages 817-822

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321095

Keywords

heart valve diseases; aortic valve stenosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The NICE guidelines for heart valve disease in adults were published as the first ever guidance by NICE in 2021. These guidelines differ from international societal guidelines, as they take into account both clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for implementation within the UK's National Health Service. This review article aims to provide an overview of the NICE guideline, compare it to other guidelines, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the NICE guideline.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines are evidence-based recommendations for health and care in England. In late 2021, NICE published its first ever guidance on the investigation and management of adults with heart valve disease. This followed on from recent updates to the international societal practice guidelines on heart valve disease produced by the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (in 2020) and the European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (in 2021). The purpose of the NICE guidance has significant differences from societal guidelines, as NICE guidance is designed for implementation within the UK's taxpayer-funded National Health Service and thus must account not just for clinical effectiveness of treatments but cost-effectiveness also. This explains some of the differences between recent recommendations from these bodies, most notably in the treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, in which NICE clearly explains that cost implications influenced their final guidance (which differs from the recently published European and North American guidelines). The aims of this review article are to provide an overview of the scope and recommendations of the NICE guideline and to compare and contrast the guidelines, highlighting reasons for differences between the guidance from professional societies and NICE and discussing the relative strengths and weaknesses of the NICE guideline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available