Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Thanida Yotpibulwong, Sirida Arunjaroensuk, Boosana Kaboosaya, Phonkit Sinpitaksakul, Mansuang Arksornnukit, Nikos Mattheos, Atiphan Pimkhaokham
Summary: The objective of this study was to compare the implant accuracy of combined static and dynamic CAIS with static, dynamic CAIS, and freehand surgery for single implant placement. The results showed that the combined static and dynamic CAIS provided significantly higher accuracy compared to the other methods.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
(2023)
Article
Chemistry, Multidisciplinary
Eric Battista, Roberta Gasparro, Maria Cacciola, Gilberto Sammartino, Gaetano Marenzi
Summary: The study suggests that the dynamic navigation system for implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic region is accurate for prosthetically driven implant placement.
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
(2022)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Carmen Pomares-Puig, M. Angeles Sanchez-Garces, Adria Jorba-Garcia
Summary: The study assessed the accuracy and patient reported outcome measures of the computer-guided double factor technique for treating fully edentulous patients. The results showed that this technique provides accurate and predictable results in the treatment of fully edentulous patients.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Seyedeh Sahar Taheri Otaghsara, Tim Joda, Florian Markus Thieringer
Summary: This in-vitro study compared the accuracy of implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) at two implant sites. The results showed that both static and dynamic CAIS resulted in accurate implant placement. However, dynamic CAIS exhibited higher deviation in the mesial direction in an in-vitro setting. Additionally, the accuracy of both CAIS approaches was affected by the implant site.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Yiqun Wu, Baoxin Tao, Kengliang Lan, Yihan Shen, Wei Huang, Feng Wang
Summary: This study assessed the accuracy of a real-time dynamic navigation system in zygomatic implant surgery and summarized device-related negative events and their management. The results showed that navigation-supported zygomatic implantation is an accurate and reliable surgical approach, but technical negative events in the navigation process should be given attention.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
(2022)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Sihui Zhang, Qin Cai, Weiyi Chen, Yuxuan Lin, Yan Gao, Dong Wu, Jiang Chen
Summary: This study compared the deviations between implant planning and placement using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (d-CAIS) and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (r-CAIS) methods. The results showed that r-CAIS achieved more accurate implant placement compared to d-CAIS, with no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Xiaotong Wang, Eman Shaheen, Sohaib Shujaat, Jan Meeus, Paul Legrand, Pierre Lahoud, Mauricio do Nascimento Gerhardt, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs
Summary: This study aimed to compare the performance of novice versus experienced practitioners in dental implant placement using different approaches. The results showed that the navigation approach significantly improved the accuracy of implant placement regardless of experience. However, the surgical time was significantly longer with navigation. Novice practitioners showed higher self-confidence compared to experienced practitioners when using guided approaches. Additionally, novice practitioners showed comparable self-confidence to experienced practitioners when using the navigation approach.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY
(2022)
Review
Medicine, General & Internal
Sigmar Schnutenhaus, Cornelia Edelmann, Anne Knipper, Ralph G. Luthardt
Summary: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. The results showed that the clinical accuracy of dynamic navigation is comparable to static navigation, but there is great heterogeneity in dynamic navigation systems, indicating a need for further research to validate their feasibility.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
(2021)
Review
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Adria Jorba-Garcia, Albert Gonzalez-Barnadas, Octavi Camps-Font, Rui Figueiredo, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellon
Summary: The study assessed the accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery systems in placing dental implants, finding that these systems are more accurate than static computer-aided implant surgery systems and freehand implant placement.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
(2021)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Marton Kivovics, Anna Takacs, Dorottya Penzes, Orsolya Nemeth, Eitan Mijiritsky
Summary: This in vitro study compared the accuracy of implant placement in model surgeries using three different methods. The results showed that the accuracy of AR-based dynamic navigation was comparable to static CAIS and superior to the free-hand method in terms of implant positioning.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
(2022)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Lijuan Ma, Mingjun Ye, Mingle Wu, Xiaolei Chen, Shan Shen
Summary: The accuracy of implant placement assisted by a dynamic navigation system meets the clinical needs and is higher than that of traditional implants. Different jaw positions, lateral locations, and implant diameters and lengths do not affect the accuracy of dental implants guided by the dynamic navigation system. The tip deviation in the anterior teeth area is greater than in the posterior teeth area. As the number of dynamic implantation procedures performed by the same implant doctor increases, the angle deviation gradually decreases.
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Mats Wernfried Heinrich Bose, Florian Beuer, Andreas Schwitalla, Maria Bruhnke, Insa Herklotz
Summary: This study compared the planned and transferred implant position in single-tooth gaps using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery, showing satisfactory results. The investigated DNS seems reliable in transferring PIP with acceptable deviations in vitro.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
(2022)
Article
Oncology
Santiago Ochandiano, David Garcia-Mato, Alba Gonzalez-Alvarez, Rafael Moreta-Martinez, Manuel Tousidonis, Carlos Navarro-Cuellar, Ignacio Navarro-Cuellar, Jose Ignacio Salmeron, Javier Pascau
Summary: Image-guided surgery, prosthetic-based virtual planning, 3D printing, and CAD/ CAM technology have revolutionized head and neck ablative and reconstructive surgical oncology, enabling accurate dental implant placement and improving quality of life. A learning curve exists for surgeons using guided methods, with dynamic navigation cases achieving the highest accuracy in implant placement. Smartphone-based augmented reality visualization is a valuable tool for intraoperative visualization and final verification, contributing to the success of free flap oncological reconstruction.
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
(2022)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
S. Jaemsuwan, S. Arunjaroensuk, B. Kaboosaya, K. Subbalekha, N. Mattheos, A. Pimkhaokham
Summary: The study evaluated the accuracy of implant placement using three protocols in fully edentulous patients, and found that both static and dynamic CAIS demonstrated higher accuracy compared to the freehand protocol.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Po-Jan Kuo, Chi-Yu Lin, Tsung-Fu Hung, Hsien-Chung Chiu, Hsin-Yu Kuo
Summary: The study investigated a novel workflow integrating dynamic navigation for immediate single-implant placement in the esthetic zone. Results showed that this approach achieved successful implant placement and good aesthetics, with high patient satisfaction and no surgical or biological complications.
JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES
(2022)