4.2 Article

Medical emergency team may reduce obstetric intensive care unit admissions

Journal

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 106-113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13177

Keywords

critical illness; hospital rapid response team; intensive care unit; obstetrics

Funding

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI15C1106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimSome recent studies have reported that early intervention by a medical emergency team (MET) for clinical deterioration before intensive care unit (ICU) admission was associated with a survival benefit in critically ill cancer patients. We hypothesized that early MET intervention for an obstetric crisis in the general wards would be related to favorable outcomes in critically ill obstetric patients. MethodsData of obstetric patients who were managed by a MET were collected retrospectively from 1 March 2008 to 30 April 2015. A total of 69 obstetric patients were enrolled. Among them, 48 (69.6%) were treated successfully in the general wards and 21 (30.4%) were transferred to the ICU. ResultsMajor causes of MET activation were pulmonary edema (n = 23, 33.3%), hypovolemic shock (n = 19, 27.5%), and septic shock (n = 8, 11.6%). Compared with the patients treated in the general ward, the patients transferred to the ICU had significantly higher severity of illness score. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was the most useful for prediction of ICU admission of obstetric patients (AUC, 0.810, P < 0.001), and the ideal cut-off was 4 (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 60%). During the study period, in-hospital mortality of the obstetric patients was 2.9% (2/69). ConclusionAfter MET activation many obstetric patients could be successfully treated in the general wards without mortality. Therefore, MET may reduce ICU admissions in critically ill obstetric patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available