4.7 Review

Thermal Behavior of Lithium- and Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Review on Heat Generation, Battery Degradation, Thermal Runway - Perspective and Future Directions

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 36, Issue 23, Pages 14000-14029

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c02889

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the safety issues of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). LIBs face the danger of thermal runaway, while SIBs have advantages in safety and raw material cost, but are challenged by low energy density and poor sodium kinetics. In addition, the higher solubility of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) in SIBs may lead to undesired side reactions. The paper reviews various experimental and modeling methods for thermal runaway detection and discusses future directions for the development of a battery management system (BMS) that can identify precursors to thermal runaway and implement mitigation strategies.
Safety is a major challenge plaguing the use of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) in electric vehicle (EV) applications. A wide range of operating conditions with varying temperatures and drive cycles can lead to battery abuse. A dangerous consequence of these abuses is thermal runaway (TR), an exponential increase in temperature inside the battery caused by the exothermic decomposition of the cell materials that leads to fire and explosion. It is imperative to develop methodologies to accurately predict and mitigate thermal runway. Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are inherently safer than LIBs. In addition to offering better safety, SIBs are gaining momentum due to the abundance and low cost of their raw materials compared to the limited lithium resources and high cost of elements such as cobalt, copper, and nickel used in LIBs. However, the challenge of low energy density impedes the maturation of sodium-ion technology to the same level as lithium-ion technology. There are additional challenges to the acceptability of sodium-ion batteries due to the poor sodium kinetics during insertion reactions, leading to rapid material degradation. Additionally, the higher solubility of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) observed in the case of SIBs may lead to undesired side reactions, causing increased heat generation. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the heat-release mechanisms, their differences, and prediction methodologies for the two battery chemistries. Various experimental and modeling approaches for TR detection from the literature are reviewed. Future research directions toward the development of a battery management system (BMS) with the capability to identify the precursors to thermal runaway and implement mitigation strategies are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available