4.7 Article

Mind the Gap: Two Dissociable Mechanisms of Temporal Processing in the Auditory System

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 1977-1995

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1652-15.2016

Keywords

auditory; gap detection; hearing; mouse; temporal processing; thalamus

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [084364/Z/07/Z]
  2. Action on Hearing Loss [567:UEI:JL]
  3. Wellcome Trust [084364/Z/07/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  4. RNID [567:UEI:JL, G77] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High temporal acuity of auditory processing underlies perception of speech and other rapidly varying sounds. A common measure of auditory temporal acuity in humans is the threshold for detection of brief gaps in noise. Gap-detection deficits, observed in developmental disorders, are considered evidence for sluggish auditory processing. Here we show, in a mouse model of gap-detection deficits, that auditory brain sensitivity to brief gaps in noise can be impaired even without a general loss of central auditory temporal acuity. Extracellular recordings in three different subdivisions of the auditory thalamus in anesthetized mice revealed a stimulus-specific, subdivision-specific deficit in thalamic sensitivity to brief gaps in noise in experimental animals relative to controls. Neural responses to brief gaps in noise were reduced, but responses to other rapidly changing stimuli unaffected, in lemniscal and nonlemniscal (but not polysensory) subdivisions of the medial geniculate body. Through experiments and modeling, we demonstrate that the observed deficits in thalamic sensitivity to brief gaps in noise arise from reduced neural population activity following noise offsets, but not onsets. These results reveal dissociable sound-onset-sensitive and sound-offset-sensitive channels underlying auditory temporal processing, and suggest that gap-detection deficits can arise from specific impairment of the sound-offset-sensitive channel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available