4.3 Article

Pupae survival following fire in the frosted elfin (Callophrys irus)

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 336-343

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/afe.12555

Keywords

burial depth; fire ecology; lethal temperature; prescribed fire; pupal mortality; viability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The frosted elfin butterfly is dependent on landscapes that are prone to frequent fires. Understanding the impact of fire on the species' mortality is crucial for planning effective fire management strategies to ensure its long-term survival.
1. The frosted elfin (Callophrys irus) butterfly inhabits landscapes that may be subject to frequent fire to be sustained. Frosted elfins pupate primarily in leaf litter, at the soil surface, or just below it, and may suffer high mortality rates when fires occur. Gathering better information on this source of mortality is critical to planning prescribed fire operations in a manner conducive to the long-term survival of the species.2. We buried lab-reared frosted elfin pupae (n = 61) at 0.75 cm (n = 31) or 1.75 cm (n = 30) below the ground and conducted two experimental fires that mimicked typical prescribed fires.3. Eighteen of 30 (60%) buried at 1.75 cm survived 4 weeks postburn; no pupae buried at 0.75 cm survived. Most (n = 17) of the pupae that survived successfully enclosed the following year. Surviving pupae encountered lower maximum temperatures and were exposed to shorter durations of above-lethal temperatures compared to those that died.4. Our data demonstrate that high mortality rates can be expected due to fire, yet fire remains a critical tool for maintaining the habitat. Fire practitioners should mitigate losses by using ignition patterns and suboptimal burn conditions to reduce fire intensity, or burn in a mosaic pattern across the landscape to ensure enough survival to perpetuate frosted elfin populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available