4.4 Article

'You caught me off guard': Probing the futures of complex engineered nanomaterials

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-016-3485-z

Keywords

Complex engineered nanomaterials; Technology assessment; Science policy; Anticipatory governance; Environmental health and safety; Future

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1235693]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1235693] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper applies principles and methods from the framework of anticipatory governance to the case of what the National Research Council calls complex engineered nanomaterials (CENM). This framework does not aim to generate crystal ball visions or definitive answers, but rather provides guidance for uncovering, understanding, and addressing social, ethical, environmental, and policy issues that stem from emerging technologies. Thus, in anticipation of increased CENM research, CENM products, and their different governance challenges, we aim to lay the groundwork for the anticipatory governance of CENMs by mapping out what-according to the engineers and scientists, we interviewed who are working at the research level of these CENMs-will be the main issues and themes that we need to pay attention to in the near future. The structured interviews focused on three groups of questions: (1) potential and/or actual applications and/or products from the participant's research; (2) environmental health and safety issues pertaining to both the participant's research and CENMs generally; and (3) the future of CENMs. Without a foundational understanding to build on, social scientists, policymakers, and regulatory agencies will be at a loss about how to govern CENMs before they are widely implemented in society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available