4.5 Article

Best practices for incremental capacity analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1023555

Keywords

incremental capacity (IC or dQ; dV); ICA; Li-ion; voltage response; degradation modes

Categories

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research (ONR)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [N00014-19-1-2159]
  3. FEDER funds
  4. Jose Castillejo mobility grants [MCI-20-PID2019-110955RB-I00]
  5. [CAS21/00034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This publication presents best practices for incremental capacity analysis, a technique gaining popularity due to its ability to identify battery degradation modes. The analysis can be overwhelming for newcomers due to conflicting information from poorly analyzed datasets. This work aims to provide a strong foundation and avoid common pitfalls in the analysis process.
This publication will present best practices for incremental capacity analysis, a technique whose popularity is growing year by year because of its ability to identify battery degradation modes for diagnosis and prognosis. While not complicated in principles, the analysis can often feel overwhelming for newcomers because of contradictory information introduced by ill-analyzed datasets. This work aims to summarize and centralize good practices to provide a strong baseline to start a proper analysis. We will provide general comments on the technique and how to avoid the main pitfalls. We will also discuss the best starting points for the most common battery chemistries such as layered oxides, iron phosphate, spinel or blends for positive electrodes and graphite, silicon oxide, or lithium titanate for negative electrodes. Finally, a set of complete synthetic degradation maps for the most common commercially available chemistries will be provided and discussed to serve as guide for future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available