Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages e254
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Online
2016-09-19
DOI
10.2196/jmir.5889
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites
- (2015) Martin Emmert et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Taking Patients’ Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science
- (2015) Mark Schlesinger et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website
- (2014) Martin Emmert et al. HEALTH POLICY
- England’s Experience Incorporating “Anecdotal” Reports From Consumers into Their National Reporting System
- (2014) Felix Greaves et al. MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
- Attitudes of Hospital Leaders Toward Publicly Reported Measures of Health Care Quality
- (2014) Peter K. Lindenauer et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care
- (2013) Constance H. Fung et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Publicly Reported Quality-Of-Care Measures Influenced Wisconsin Physician Groups To Improve Performance
- (2013) Geoffrey C. Lamb et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- An Analysis of Online Evaluations on a Physician Rating Website: Evidence From a German Public Reporting Instrument
- (2013) Martin Emmert et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review
- (2013) Martin Emmert et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study
- (2013) Martin Emmert et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Quality Improvement Under Nursing Home Compare
- (2013) Rachel M. Werner et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Public Reporting Helped Drive Quality Improvement In Outpatient Diabetes Care Among Wisconsin Physician Groups
- (2012) Maureen A. Smith et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Consistently Increasing Numbers of Online Ratings of Healthcare in England
- (2012) Felix Greaves et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service
- (2012) Felix Greaves et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period
- (2012) Guodong Gordon Gao et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- All Stories Are Not Alike
- (2012) Victoria A. Shaffer et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Public Reporting in Germany: the Content of Physician Rating Websites*
- (2011) M. Emmert et al. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE
- Physician Groups’ Use of Data from Patient Experience Surveys
- (2010) Mark W. Friedberg et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Changes in Clinical and Hotel Expenditures Following Publication of the Nursing Home Compare Report Card
- (2010) Dana B. Mukamel et al. MEDICAL CARE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started