4.8 Article

An all-round AI-Chemist with a scientific mind

Journal

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac190

Keywords

AI-Chemist; computational brain; mobile robot; machine reading; all-round research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces an all-round AI-Chemist equipped with scientific data intelligence, capable of performing various tasks in chemical research and controlling the experimental process autonomously.
The realization of automated chemical experiments by robots unveiled the prelude to an artificial intelligence (AI) laboratory. Several AI-based systems or robots with specific chemical skills have been demonstrated, but conducting all-round scientific research remains challenging. Here, we present an all-round AI-Chemist equipped with scientific data intelligence that is capable of performing basic tasks generally required in chemical research. Based on a service platform, the AI-Chemist is able to automatically read the literatures from a cloud database and propose experimental plans accordingly. It can control a mobile robot in-house or online to automatically execute the complete experimental process on 14 workstations, including synthesis, characterization and performance tests. The experimental data can be simultaneously analysed by the computational brain of the AI-Chemist through machine learning and Bayesian optimization, allowing a new hypothesis for the next iteration to be proposed. The competence of the AI-Chemist has been scrutinized by three different chemical tasks. In the future, the more advanced all-round AI-Chemists equipped with scientific data intelligence may cause changes to the landscape of the chemical laboratory. An all-round AI-chemist with scientific mind has been created, which is able to automatically perform all research tasks and self-controlled by its computational brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available