4.5 Article

A scenario-based desirability function for correlated multi-response optimization problems considering modeling and implementation errors

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101764

Keywords

Multi-response optimization; Robust design; Implementation error; Stochastic programming; Desirability function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the uncertainty issue in multiresponse optimization and proposes a scenario-based two-stage stochastic programming method.
Simultaneous improvement of multiple quality characteristics is one of the main concerns in today's complex industrial systems. Multiresponse optimization enables us to address this concern and find a compromise solution of design factors that leads to desirable quality outputs. This problem becomes complicated when some degree of uncertainty affects the result of the experiments. In this paper, two sources of uncertainty are included in multiresponse optimization problems. The first is experimental errors related to unknown variables, also called environmental nuisances, creating response surface modeling errors. The second source is errors in implementation. In the experimentation, the controllable factors are mainly set at some predefined levels, but after the optimal design has been found, it oscillates around that value during the implementation phase. To handle this problem, a scenario-based two-stage stochastic programming is developed in which desirability functions are aggregated to form the final objective function. Scenarios are generated by sampling from probability distribution functions of the response surfaces' coefficients under normality assumptions. The numerical results show that joint consideration of the error sources leads to a smaller range of desirability values among the different scenarios and a higher value of the total desirability index.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available