4.7 Review

D-3-creatine dilution for skeletal muscle mass measurement: historical development and current

Journal

JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 2595-2607

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13083

Keywords

body composition; isotope dilution; malnutrition; nutritional assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of creatine in meat by French chemist Michel Eugene Chevreul two centuries ago led to the subsequent study of its presence in human skeletal muscles. Researchers have utilized various methods to estimate creatine pool size and calculate skeletal muscle mass, with the recent introduction of stable isotope dilution method generating renewed interest. However, the current assumptions and limitations of these methods raise concerns about their accuracy and reliability.
The French chemist Michel Eugene Chevreul discovered creatine in meat two centuries ago. Extensive biochemical and physiological studies of this organic molecule followed with confirmation that creatine is found within the cytoplasm and mitochondria of human skeletal muscles. Two groups of investigators exploited these relationships five decades ago by first estimating the creatine pool size in vivo with C-14 and N-15 labelled isotopes. Skeletal muscle mass (kg) was then calculated by dividing the creatine pool size (g) by muscle creatine concentration (g/kg) measured on a single muscle biopsy or estimated from the literature. This approach for quantifying skeletal muscle mass is generating renewed interest with the recent introduction of a practical stable isotope (creatine-(methyl-d3)) dilution method for estimating the creatine pool size across the full human lifespan. The need for a muscle biopsy has been eliminated by assuming a constant value for whole-body skeletal muscle creatine concentration of 4.3 g/kg wet weight. The current single compartment model of estimating creatine pool size and skeletal muscle mass rests on four main assumptions: tracer absorption is complete; tracer is all retained; tracer is distributed solely in skeletal muscle; and skeletal muscle creatine concentration is known and constant. Three of these assumptions are false to varying degrees. Not all tracer is retained with urinary isotope losses ranging from 0% to 9%; an empirical equation requiring further validation is used to correct for spillage. Not all tracer is distributed in skeletal muscle with non-muscle creatine sources ranging from 2% to 10% with a definitive value lacking. Lastly, skeletal muscle creatine concentration is not constant and varies between muscles (e.g. 3.89-4.62 g/kg), with diets (e.g. vegetarian and omnivore), across age groups (e.g. middle-age, similar to 4.5 g/kg; old-age, 4.0 g/kg), activity levels (e.g. athletes, similar to 5 g/kg) and in disease states (e.g. muscular dystrophies, <3 g/kg). Some of the variability in skeletal muscle creatine concentrations can be attributed to heterogeneity in the proportions of wet skeletal muscle as myofibres, connective tissues, and fat. These observations raise serious concerns regarding the accuracy of the deuterated-creatine dilution method for estimating total body skeletal muscle mass as now defined by cadaver analyses of whole wet tissues and in vivo approaches such as magnetic resonance imaging. A new framework is needed in thinking about how this potentially valuable method for measuring the creatine pool size in vivo can be used in the future to study skeletal muscle biology in health and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available