4.6 Article

Preparation and characterization of nanoscale LiFePO4 cathode materials by a two-step solid-state reaction method

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 2366-2372

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-0531-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Urumqi Science and Technology Plan [P151010005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61504168]
  3. Thousand Youth Talents Plan [Y42H831301]
  4. Foundation of Director of Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [2015RC010]
  5. Hebei outstanding young scholars, Science and Technology Program of Hebei Province [D2016403064, 16044601Z]
  6. Hebei Science and Technology Support Program [15211121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to obtain high-performance nanoscale LiFePO4 cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries, CH3COOLi center dot 2H(2)O, FeC2O4 center dot 2H(2)O, and NH4H2PO4 were used as raw materials to prepare the precursors of LiFePO4 by room-temperature solid-state reaction method firstly; then, LiFePO4 cathode materials were synthesized by high heating solid-state reaction method. The influence of temperature on the crystal structure, microstructure, and electrochemical properties were studied by thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and charge-discharge performance test. It was indicated that the olivine-phase LiFePO4 not only presented nano-sized particles in the range of 40-80 nm, but also showed excellent initial discharge specific capacity of about 155 mAh/g at 0.2 C at a sintering temperature of 700 A degrees C and possessed good cycle performance. This preparation method without any solvent and carbon source addition could realize industrialized production of single-phase nano-LiFePO4.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available