4.6 Article

Material flow and intermixing during friction stir spot welding of steel

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 227, Issue -, Pages 96-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.08.006

Keywords

Friction stir spot welding (FSSW) of steel; Material flow; Tracer material technique; Bonding ligament; Vortex flow

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
  2. Steel Development Fund (Government of India)
  3. Tata Steel Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tracer materials as inserts have been used to study the material flow during Friction stir spot welding (FSSW) of DP590 steel of 1.6 mm thickness. A PCBN tool with convex scrolled shoulder was used for welding. The progressive development of the material flow with tool penetration has been investigated by tracking the tracer distribution. When flow conditions are established, the shoulder scrolls provide the driving force for material flow by dragging the plasticized materials towards the pin and releasing them there. The released material flow outwards and upwards towards the shoulder periphery along different sub-surface flow routes. Successive flows in this fashion builds up the material circulation within the flow zone. The bonding ligament is created by intermixing of material between the overlapping sheets. The flow zone size and ligament width increases with increasing tool penetration. The flow zone encompasses the pin and a large area below the tool shoulder. Material flow during FSSW can be subdivided in two components, namely rotational flow and through thickness flow. A combination of the two components results in the spiraling motion of plasticized material within the flow zone. A material transport model is developed on the basis of experimental observations, illustrating the material flow during FSSW and the formation of bonding ligament. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available