Benchmarking distance-based partitioning methods for mixed-type data

Clustering mixed-type data, that is, observation by variable data that consist of both continuous and categorical variables poses novel challenges. Foremost among these challenges is the choice of the most appropriate clustering method for the data. This paper presents a benchmarking study comparing eight distance-based partitioning methods for mixed-type data in terms of cluster recovery performance. A series of simulations carried out by a full factorial design are presented that examined the effect of a variety of factors on cluster recovery. The amount of cluster overlap, the percentage of categorical variables in the data set, the number of clusters and the number of observations had the largest effects on cluster recovery and in most of the tested scenarios. KAMILA, K-Prototypes and sequential Factor Analysis and K-Means clustering typically performed better than other methods. The study can be a useful reference for practitioners in the choice of the most appropriate method.

Automated summary

This paper investigates the choice of clustering methods for mixed-type data and compares the performance of eight distance-based partitioning methods through a series of simulation experiments. The study finds that the amount of cluster overlap, the percentage of categorical variables, the number of clusters, and the number of observations have significant effects on cluster recovery.