4.8 Article

Codiversification of gut microbiota with humans

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 377, Issue 6612, Pages 1328-1332

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abm7759

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. European Union
  4. National Institute for Health Research
  5. Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  6. King's College London
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-15CE02-0003]
  8. NIH [R35-GM128716]
  9. Wellcome Trust
  10. Chronic Disease Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gut microbiomes of human populations worldwide have common core microbial species. However, within a species, certain strains show population specificity. This study suggests that humans and their gut microbes have experienced parallel evolutionary history, and specific microbial strains may play a crucial role in microbiome-mediated disease phenotypes.
The gut microbiomes of human populations worldwide have many core microbial species in common. However, within a species, some strains can show remarkable population specificity. The question is whether such specificity arises from a shared evolutionary history (codiversification) between humans and their microbes. To test for codiversification of host and microbiota, we analyzed paired gut metagenomes and human genomes for 1225 individuals in Europe, Asia, and Africa, including mothers and their children. Between and within countries, a parallel evolutionary history was evident for humans and their gut microbes. Moreover, species displaying the strongest codiversification independently evolved traits characteristic of host dependency, including reduced genomes and oxygen and temperature sensitivity. These findings all point to the importance of understanding the potential role of population-specific microbial strains in microbiome-mediated disease phenotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available