4.5 Article

The effect of pulse duration on the Brillouin frequency shift accuracy in the differential cross-spectrum BOTDR (DCS-BOTDR) fiber sensor

Journal

OPTICAL FIBER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yofte.2022.102977

Keywords

BOTDR; Cross-correlation; Signal differential; BFS accuracy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FRGS/2/2014/TK03/UKM/02/4]
  2. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) through the Geran Universiti Penyelidikan [GUP-2019-024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the impact of pulse duration on the accuracy of Brillouin frequency shift (BFS) measurement in a previously proposed fiber sensing technique. The experiment explores the optimal range of pulse duration for accurate BFS measurement, and also demonstrates the capability of the technique in spatial and temperature resolution measurement.
In this paper, we report the effect of pulse duration on the Brillouin frequency shift (BFS) accuracy measurement in our previously proposed differential cross-spectrum Brillouin optical time domain reflectometry (DCS-BOTDR) fiber sensing technique. The DCS-BOTDR uses a pair of optical pulsed probes generated via intensity modulation scheme, in which the first probe consists of a long- and short duration of pulses separated by a short interval, while the second probe only has the long pulse with the same duration as the first one. From the experimental analysis, by varying the duration of the long pulse between 6 and 60 ns, we found that an optimum range of the long pulse duration between 14 and 22 ns provided good measurement of BFS accuracy around 5.3 MHz. Furthermore, by heating up a 2 m fiber section at the end of a 4 km test fiber, by using long- and short pulse durations of 18 ns and 4 ns respectively, we have successfully demonstrated 40 cm spatial resolution and 4 degrees C of temperature resolution measurement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available