4.5 Article

The Effects of Rituximab on Lipids, Arterial Stiffness, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Journal

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 202-207

Publisher

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.2.202

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis; Lipids; Carotid Atherosclerosis; Arterial Stiffness; Rituximab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to examine lipid profiles, arterial stiffness (AS), and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), in 55 women with RA without overt cardiovascular disease (CVD) treated with rituximab (RTX). The following parameters were recorded before and 24 weeks after RTX therapy (2 infusions of 500 or 1,000 mg RTX intravenously, fortnightly): plasma total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, DAS 28-ESR, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), RF IgM, AS (SI -stiffness index, RI -reflection index) by digital volume pulse contour analysis (Micro Medical, UK), and common cIMT by high-resolution B-mode carotid ultrasound. Based on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, patients were divided into two groups: 1) moderate/good response to RTX therapy after 24 weeks (41 patients, 75%), 2) no response to RTX therapy (14 patients, 25%). Effective RTX therapy resulted in 9% increase in TC, 23% increase in HDL-C and 14% decrease in atherogenic index, 57% decrease in SI and 24% decrease in RI. We observed a 9% decrease of cIMTmax at 24 weeks. The improvement of cardiovascular parameters was accompanied by statistically significant decreases of CRP, ESR, RF IgM, and DAS 28 in group 1 (P < 0.05). There were no significant changes in lipid profile, AS parameters, and cIMT in group 2. Two infusions of RTX in case of moderate/good EULAR effect of therapy exerted favorable effects on lipid profile, AS and cIMT in women with RA without overt CVD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available