4.5 Article

Olaparib as maintenance treatment in patients with chemosensitive small cell lung cancer (STOMP): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 26-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.07.007

Keywords

Small cell lung cancer; Maintenance treatment; Olaparib; Clinical trial

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C22436/A25354, CRUK/10/037]
  2. AstraZeneca [ISS22810017]
  3. UK National Cancer Research Network
  4. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the activity and safety of olaparib as maintenance treatment for chemoresponsive small cell lung cancer patients. The results showed no significant difference in progression-free survival between olaparib and placebo, and the toxicity of olaparib was similar to other studies.
Objectives: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) responds well to chemoradiotherapy but frequently relapses. Here, we evaluate activity and safety of the poly (adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib as maintenance treatment for patients with chemoresponsive SCLC. Materials and methods: Eligible patients had complete or partial response to first line chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy for SCLC. Patients were randomised 2:2:1:1 to olaparib 300 mg twice a day (BD), olaparib 200 mg three times a day (TDS), placebo BD or placebo TDS. The primary outcome was progression-free survival time (PFS). The trial design had 80% power to detect a 3-month difference in median PFS based on a one-sided 5% significance level. Secondary outcome measures included overall survival time (OS), adverse events and quality of life. ISRCTN 73164486, EudraCT 2010-021165-76. Results: 220 patients were randomised: 74 placebo, 73 olaparib BD, 73 olaparib TDS. Median PFS (90% confi-dence interval (CI)) was 2.5 (1.8, 3.7), 3.7 (3.1, 4.6) and 3.6 (2.8, 4.7) months in the placebo, olaparib BD and TDS arms, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS between olaparib and placebo for either BD (Hazard Ratio (HR) (90%CI) 0.76 (0.57, 1.02), P = 0.125 or TDS 0.86, (0.64, 1.15), P = 0.402. Common adverse events on olaparib were fatigue, nausea, anaemia, vomiting and anorexia. Of 214 patients who discontinued treatment before 24 months, toxicity was the reason cited for 66 (18 placebo, 24 olaparib BD, 24 olaparib TDS). Conclusion: This trial does not provide sufficient evidence that either the BD or TDS regimen for maintenance olaparib monotherapy improves PFS or OS in an unselected SCLC population to warrant further research. Toxicity for olaparib was similar to other studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available