Multiple revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: not the best but still good
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Multiple revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: not the best but still good
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-10-13
DOI
10.1007/s00167-022-07197-8
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Revising a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament: one- or two-stage procedure?
- (2022) Timo Järvelä et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- Where to prospectively register a systematic review
- (2022) Dawid Pieper et al. Systematic Reviews
- Revision Rates After Primary ACL Reconstruction Performed Between 1969 and 2018: A Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis
- (2022) Rasmus J. Liukkonen et al. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Trends in Level of Evidence of Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine, 2010-2020 : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2022) Tyler Paras et al. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice
- (2021) Sachin Tapasvi et al. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Influence of Preoperative Tunnel Widening On the Outcomes of a Single Stage–Only Approach to Every Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 409 Consecutive Patients From the SANTI Study Group
- (2021) Charles Pioger et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Age, time from injury to surgery and quadriceps strength affect the risk of revision surgery after primary ACL reconstruction
- (2021) Riccardo Cristiani et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- Good Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Low Rates of Return to Sports after Repeat Revision ACL Reconstruction
- (2021) Tomás D. Gorodischer et al. Journal of Knee Surgery
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction
- (2021) Mark D. Miller et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS
- Outcomes of 1- Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2020) Matthew Colatruglio et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Latest Trends in ACL Reconstruction
- (2020) Robert G. Marx SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW
- Beighton Score, Tibial Slope, Tibial Subluxation, Quadriceps Circumference Difference, and Family History Are Risk Factors for ACL Graft Failure: A Retrospective Comparison of Primary and Revision ACL Reconstructions
- (2020) Connor G. Ziegler et al. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY
- Quality assessment for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies
- (2020) Bashar J. Qumseya GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Similar risk of ACL graft revision for alpine skiers, football and handball players: the graft revision rate is influenced by age and graft choice
- (2019) Arne Ekeland et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Re-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction showed more laxity than revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a minimum 2-year follow-up
- (2019) Kyoung Ho Yoon et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- Rates of revision and surgeon-reported graft rupture following ACL reconstruction: early results from the New Zealand ACL Registry
- (2019) Richard Rahardja et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- Multiple ACL Revision: Failure Analysis and Clinical Outcomes
- (2019) Francesco Dini et al. Journal of Knee Surgery
- Expanding the CONSORT Figure: Increasing Transparency in Reporting on External Validity
- (2018) Russell E. Glasgow et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- The long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who suffer recurrent injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament after reconstruction
- (2017) I. Ahmed et al. Bone & Joint Journal
- Age-Related Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- (2015) Gregory B. Maletis et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- After revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, who returns to sport? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) Alberto Grassi et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Hamstring Autograft Versus Soft-Tissue Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2014) Gregory L. Cvetanovich et al. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY
- Is posterior tibial slope associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury?
- (2014) Chao Zeng et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- Outcomes of Repeat Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- (2013) Timothy B. Griffith et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Risk Factors for Recurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- (2013) David Wasserstein et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions
- (2013) James L. Chen et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Autograft Versus Nonirradiated Allograft Tissue for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- (2013) Michael W. Mariscalco et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Allograft Salvage Procedure in Multiple-Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- (2013) Roberto Buda et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Repeat Revision of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- (2009) Julien Wegrzyn et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started