4.8 Article

Toward Detection of the Molecular Parity Violation in Chiral Ru(acac)3 and Os(acac)3

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 42, Pages 10011-10017

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02434

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Information Technology of the University of Groningen
  2. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-20-0098, APVV-20-0127]
  3. Scientific Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic [1/0777/19]
  4. ANR project PVCM [ANR15-CE30-0005-01]
  5. Ile-de-France region (DIM-NanoK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a theory-experiment investigation on the helically chiral compounds Ru(acac)(3) and Os(acac)(3) as candidates for next-generation experiments in detecting molecular parity violation (PV) in vibrational spectra. By using relativistic density functional theory calculations, optimal vibrational modes with PV effects exceeding the projected instrumental sensitivity of the ultrahigh resolution experiment being constructed at the Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers in Paris by up to two orders of magnitude were identified. Preliminary measurements of the vibrational spectrum of Ru(acac)(3) were conducted as the initial steps towards the planned experiment.
We present a theory-experiment investigation of the helically chiral compounds Ru(acac)(3) and Os(acac)(3) as candidates for next-generation experiments for detection of molecular parity violation (PV) in vibrational spectra. We used relativistic density functional theory calculations to identify optimal vibrational modes with expected PV effects exceeding by up to 2 orders of magnitude the projected instrumental sensitivity of the ultrahigh resolution experiment under construction at the Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers in Paris. Preliminary measurements of the vibrational spectrum of Ru(acac)(3) carried out as the first steps toward the planned experiment are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available