4.7 Article

Study on the Effect of Molecular Weight on the Gut Microbiota Fermentation Properties of Blackberry Polysaccharides In Vitro

Journal

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c03091

Keywords

blackberry; polysaccharide; molecular weight; fermentation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32001647]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011996]
  3. National Natural Science Founda- tion of China [31972022]
  4. Guangzhou Science and Technology Program [201907010035]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515011670]
  6. 111 Project [B17018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the molecular weight of blackberry polysaccharides has an impact on their metabolic characteristics. Lower molecular weight polysaccharides are more easily degraded and utilized by intestinal microbiota, with a faster production rate of short-chain fatty acids.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of different molecular weights on the metabolic characteristics of blackberry polysaccharides (BBP). After degradation, three fractions, namely, BBP-8, BBP-16, and BBP-24, were obtained. During fermentation, all polysaccharide fractions were significantly degraded and utilized by the intestinal microbiota, and the lower-molecular-weight polysaccharides were easier to be fermented with higher gas production and carbohydrate consumption rates. Furthermore, the monosaccharide utilization sequence of all polysaccharides was glucose > galactose > arabinose > galacturonic acid. In addition, the lower-molecular-weight polysaccharides had a faster short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production rate but did not affect the final SCFA yields. The fermentation of BBP promoted the increase of Bacteroidetes and the decrease of Firmicutes. The proportions of Bacteroidetes in BBP, BBP-8, BBP-16, and BBP-24 were 45.41, 47.50, 48.08, and 50.09%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available