4.7 Article

Development of a Global Respiratory Severity Score for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Infants

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 215, Issue 5, Pages 750-756

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw624

Keywords

Lower respiratory tract infection; respiratory severity score; respiratory syncytial virus; upper respiratory tract infection

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [HHSN272201200005C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants has recognizable clinical signs and symptoms. However, quantification of disease severity is difficult, and published scores remain problematic. Thus, as part of a RSV pathogenesis study, we developed a global respiratory severity score (GRSS) as a research tool for evaluating infants with primary RSV infection. Methods. Previously healthy infants <10 months of age with RSV infections representing the spectrum of disease severity were prospectively evaluated. Clinical signs and symptoms were collected at 3 time points from hospitalized infants and those seen in ambulatory settings. Data were also extracted from office, emergency department, and hospital records. An unbiased data-driven approach using factor analysis was used to develop a GRSS. Results. A total of 139 infants (84 hospitalized and 55 nonhospitalized) were enrolled. Using hospitalization status as the output variable, 9 clinical variables were identified and weighted to produce a composite GRSS. The GRSS had an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.961. Construct validity was demonstrated via a significant correlation with length of stay (r = 0.586, P < .0001). Conclusions. Using routine clinical variables, we developed a severity score for infants with RSV infection that should be useful as an end point for investigation of disease pathogenesis and as an outcome measure for therapeutic interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available