4.7 Article

epiDMS: Data Management and Analytics for Decision-Making From Epidemic Spread Simulation Ensembles

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages S427-S432

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw305

Keywords

epidemics; big data; simulation ensembles; data management; analytics; public health decision-making

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1318788, 1518939]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1318788, 1518939] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Carefully calibrated large-scale computational models of epidemic spread represent a powerful tool to support the decision-making process during epidemic emergencies. Epidemic models are being increasingly used for generating forecasts of the spatial-temporal progression of epidemics at different spatial scales and for assessing the likely impact of different intervention strategies. However, the management and analysis of simulation ensembles stemming from large-scale computational models pose challenges, particularly when dealing with multiple interdependent parameters, spanning multiple layers and geospatial frames, affected by complex dynamic processes operating at different resolutions. Methods. We describe and illustrate with examples a novel epidemic simulation data management system, epiDMS, that was developed to address the challenges that arise from the need to generate, search, visualize, and analyze, in a scalable manner, large volumes of epidemic simulation ensembles and observations during the progression of an epidemic. Results and conclusions. epiDMS is a publicly available system that facilitates management and analysis of large epidemic simulation ensembles. epiDMS aims to fill an important hole in decision-making during healthcare emergencies by enabling critical services with significant economic and health impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available