4.5 Article

The stability of a liquid-water body below the south polar cap of Mars

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 383, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115073

Keywords

Mars; Polar caps; Thermal histories; Ices

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Universities project [PGC2018-095340-B-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radar data from the Mars Express spacecraft suggest the presence of subsurface liquid water at a depth of 1.5 km in the Planum Australe region. This finding has significant implications for the thermal state of the area. The study recalculates the depth of the liquid water and analyzes the influence of regional thermal properties on surface heat flow and subsurface temperatures.
Radar data from the Mars Express spacecraft show bright subsurface reflections in the Planum Australe area that could be due to liquid water located at a depth of 1.5 km (Orosei et al., 2018). If this interpretation of the data is correct, the presence of such water would have important implications for the present-day thermal state of the region. In this article, we recalculate the depth of the liquid water and we analyze the influence of the regional thermal properties in the surface heat flow and the subsurface temperatures. We have obtained a new depth to the bright reflector between 1.3 and 1.5 km by using a temperature dependent relative permittivity for the water ice and taking into account the dust content in the area. We show that regional properties in the SPLD moderately influence the thermal state of the area where the liquid water is located. A better knowledge of the porosity profile in the studied area is necessary to constrain surface heat flow and subsurface temperatures accurately. Our findings are in agreement with previous work that shows anomalously high local heat flows would be required to sustain liquid water at this location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available