4.3 Article

Sap volatile components in relation to susceptibility of anthracnose and Aspergillus rot of mangoes (Mangifera indica L.)

Journal

JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 206-213

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2016.1249962

Keywords

Mango sap; postharvest diseases; disease resistance; postharvest disorder

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka [RG/2009/AG/02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sap burn injury and postharvest diseases are major causes of mango fruit quality deterioration, resulting in considerable postharvest losses in many countries. Susceptibility of selected culti-vars of mango in Sri Lanka to sap burn injury and the incidence of anthracnose and Aspergillus rot of mango were examined in this study. Volatile components of non-aqueous (oil) phase were investigated using GC-MS, and artificial inoculation studies were carried out to assess disease resistance with Colletotrichum queesnlandicum (KC 820802) and Aspergillus niger (KC 820801). It was observed that the popular 'Karuthakolumban' and 'Willard' mangoes with high sap flow at harvest and high sap burn incidence were more susceptible to sap burn injury compared with 'Chembaddan' and 'Ambalavi' mangoes. Cultivar variations in susceptibility to Aspergillus rot of mangoes are reported for the first time in this study, where 'Willard' mangoes were more resistant to Aspergillus rot than other cultivars. The sap exudates of 'Ambalavi' and 'Karuthakolumban' mangoes were observed to contain the preformed antifungal compounds 5-pentadecyl resorcinol and 5-(Heptadeca-8,11- dienyl) benzene1,3-diol, with variety 'Ambalavi' showing a high resorcinol level. These cultivars were found to be resistant to anthracnose disease. These results suggest that presence of sap volatiles is cultivar dependent and could be used to identify cultivars resistant to postharvest diseases and sap burn.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available