4.5 Article

Right ventricular assist device results in worse post-transplant survival

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 236-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.018

Keywords

mechanical circulatory support; right ventricular assist device; left ventricular assist device; heart failure; heart transplantation; congestive heart failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, how the need for a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) affects outcomes after orthotopic heart transplantation has not been studied in a multi-institutional database. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult orthotopic heart transplantations from the period 2005-2012. Patients requiring a RVAD + LVAD as a bridge to transplant were compared with patients requiring a LVAD only and patients requiring no ventricular assist device (VAD). RESULTS: During the study period, 16,955 orthotopic heart transplantations were performed. Of these, 13,209 (77.9%) patients did not require a VAD, 3,270 (19.3%) required a LVAD only, and 457 (2.7%) required a RVAD + LVAD. The RVAD + LVAD group had the longest length of stay (25.7 days) compared with the no VAD group (20.8 days) and the LVAD-only group (21.1 days) (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, requirement of a RVAD + LVAD before transplantation was independently associated with post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.49, p = 0.04). Other variables associated with mortality included donor age, pulsatile flow LVAD as a bridge to transplant, prolonged ischemic time, worsening renal function, black race, history of diabetes in recipient, class II panel-reactive antibody >10%, sex mismatch, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation as a bridge to transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The requirement of a RVAD in addition to a LVAD before orthotopic heart transplantation is. associated with worse post-transplant outcomes and increased mortality. (C) 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available