4.5 Article

Incentivizing and nudging farmers to spread information: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 994-1010

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12346

Keywords

agricultural extension; clawback; integrated pest management; reference-dependent utility; social prestige vs material rewards

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the flow of information about an innovation (IPM) in farmer groups in Ethiopia through an experiment. Incentives and loss-framed messaging were used to increase the diffusion effort, but they failed to encourage follower farmers to experiment with the innovation. The effectiveness of the loss frame was attenuated due to difficulty in reclaiming material rewards after a long delay.
Information does not flow freely through social networks. We use an experiment to study knowledge diffusion about an innovation (integrated pest management, IPM) in farmer groups in Ethiopia. Group leaders are incentivized to share knowledge with members through the conditional provision of material or social prestige rewards. We combine incentives with loss-framed messaging to leverage loss aversion. Incentives increase diffusion effort, and combining incentives with loss-framed messaging increases effort further. However, the treatments failed to induce follower farmers to experiment with IPM. We also document that reclaiming material rewards is difficult after a long delay, attenuating the effectiveness of the loss frame.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available