3.8 Article

JUSTICE FOR EMPLOYEE VOICE: A DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

Journal

INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 995-1025

Publisher

INST FEDERAL EDUCACAO, CIENCIA & TECNOLOGIA SAO PAULO
DOI: 10.14807/ijmp.v13i5.1576

Keywords

Organizational Justice; Distributive justice; Procedural justice; Interactional justice; Employee voice behavior

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the direct effects of distributive justice and procedural justice on voice behavior, as well as the moderating role of interactional justice. Using survey data collected from 173 employees in a marble company in Mugla, Turkey, the results of regression analysis show that procedural justice positively affects employee voice and that interactional justice moderates this effect. The findings also indicate that different levels of interactional justice have a similar directional effect on the relationship between procedural justice and employee voice. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
This study aims to put forward whether distributive justice and procedural justice have a direct effect on the behavior of voice and whether interactional justice has a moderating role on this effect. In order to evaluate the relations between variables, a survey technique is used and data were collected from 173 employees from a marble company in the city of Mugla (Turkey) with a convenience sampling method In the test of hypotheses, regression analysis is used The regression analysis was conducted via the Conditional Process Macro for SPSS developed by Andrew PI Hayes. The . findings of the research showed that procedural justice affects employee voice positively and interactional justice has a moderating role in this effect. Additionally, as per the findings, it was seen that on the effect of procedural justice on employee voice, different levels of interactional justice have the same directional effect. Theoretical and practical implications were made by considering all the findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available