Journal
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 795-806Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.594
Keywords
implant abutment emergence angle; implant abutment emergence profile; peri-implantitis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This systematic review aimed to analyze the relationship between the implant-abutment emergence angle (EA) and implant emergence profile (EP) and the prevalence of peri-implantitis. The review included three studies and found a significant association between an EA above 30 degrees and a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis. Additionally, a convex EP was also associated with a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis.
Statement: The aim of this systematic review is to analyze literature regarding the relationship between the implant-abutment emergence angle (EA) and implant emergence profile (EP) and the prevalence of peri-implantitis. Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies from initiation up to April 2022. Studies describing the EA and EP in association with peri-implantitis were considered eligible for this review and selected for inclusion in this review if implant groups with wide and narrow EA and different EP types were described. Results: Searches in PubMed and the Cochrane Library led to 1116 unique titles and the inclusion of three studies. These concerned 168-349 implants. Two studies presented the mean prevalence of peri-implantitis which was 16.7% and 24.8% at the implant level. Both studies showed a significant relationship between peri-implantitis in bone-level implant groups with an EA above 30 degrees compared to implants with an EA below 30 degrees. A third study presented marginal bone loss which tended to be smaller when the EA was around 20 degrees-40 degrees. In one of the three included studies, the prevalence of peri-implantitis was significantly higher if implants had a convex EP compared to a concave or straight EP. Another study showed a significantly higher prevalence of peri-implantitis in implants with a convex EP compared to other EP types, if combined with an EA above 30 degrees. Conclusions: Three eligible studies were found. Reported associations should therefore be considered with caution. Synthesis suggests an association between a larger EA (>30 degrees) and a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis or marginal bone loss compared to a smaller EA (<30 degrees). A convex EP may also be associated with a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis. However, causality remains a question.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available