3.8 Review

E-Scooters and Craniofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review

Journal

CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 245-253

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/19433875221118790

Keywords

accident prevention; alcoholic intoxication; craniocerebral trauma; facial bones; facial injuries; head protective devices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review examined the demographics, risk factors, types of injury, and surgical management of craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. The findings indicate that middle third fractures, traumatic brain injuries, soft tissue injuries, dental injuries, and ophthalmological injuries are common presentations of craniofacial trauma related to e-scooters. Further research is needed to better understand surgical management and associated risk factors.
Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: Standing electric scooters (e-scooters) provide a cheap and environmentally friendly transport alternative, but also elicit substantial concern regarding their volume of associated injuries especially in the craniofacial region. This review aims to explore the demographics, risk factors, types of injury and surgical management of craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Methods: PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Exclusion criteria were duplicates; non-English publications; non-full-text publications; studies with insufficient data. Results: Of the 73 articles identified, 10 eligible articles representing 539 patients were included. The mean age was 31.5 years. Most cases were male (63.7%). Common risk factors were alcohol/drug intoxication, absence of distal extremity injuries and lack of helmet use. The most common mechanism of injury was mechanical falls (72.4%). The most common facial fracture pattern was middle third fractures (58.3%). Surgical management was required for 43.3% of fractures. Other types of injuries reported were traumatic brain injuries (17.6%), soft tissue injuries (58.3%), dental injuries (32.9%) and ophthalmological injuries (20.6%). Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest common presentations for craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Robust longitudinal evaluations with standardised descriptions of types of injuries are required. Gaps in knowledge relate to surgical management, post-operative complications and associated risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available